Home | Site Articles | Books Library | Downloading Videos | Live Videos | Contact Us

 

Main Menu

Latest Books

Languages

Select Interface Language:

Anti Ahmadiyya - Anti Qadyanis - Anti Mirza Ghulam Ahmad - Anti IslamAhmadiyya - Anti MTA TV - Anti Alislam.org: Ahmadiyya's abuse of Muslim epithet

Search on This Topic:   
[ Go to Home | Select a New Topic ]

Ahmadiyya in Indonesia
Posted by admin on Wednesday, October 07 @ 01:55:52 AST (1287 reads)
(Read More... | 58586 bytes more | Score: 0)
Ahmadiyya's abuse of Muslim epithet

Muhibban-e-Mustafa

Ahmadiyya Awareness Campaign

9th July 1997

 

Praise be to Allah, One and Only. His Love and Blessings may shower on Muhammad  http://alhafeez.org/rashid/Durood.gifafter whom there is no prophet and upon His Pious Family and Respected Companions

Ahmadiyya in Indonesia

by Dr. Syed Rashid Ali

Dear Brothers/Sisters in Islam

Assalamo alaikum. In the following section I am forwarding some of the correspondence that I had recently with a brother from Indonesia, with his permission of course. It is very sad that in the present world of Global Islamic Revival, there are still areas where Muslims are getting trapped by Qadiani/Ahmadiyya Movement out of sheer ignorance. This is not just ignorance from Islam, rather it is their unawareness from the man himself, Mirza Ghulam Ahmad, and his decietful doctrine in the name of Islam. The problem is compounded due to delibrate efforts by the Ahmadiyya Movement to portray themselves as Sunni Muslim keeping Mirza Ghulam well into the background. Outside of Indo-Pak subcontinent, very few people are aware of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani or Ahmadiyya Movement, its position in relation to Islam and the stand of Muslim Ummah/Scholars towards them. Ahmadiyya Movement takes advantage of this situation and under the garb of Sunni Muslims, they are actively engaged in trapping unsuspecting Muslims in remote areas. They use various tactics, one of which is highlighted in this case. It is hightime that Muslims should rise to this situation and fight this evil to the best of thier capabilities.

First Letter from Indonesia:

Subject: Ahmadiyya in Indonesia

Date: Sun, 8 Jun 1997 18:23:10 +0700

From: "yesaya"

To:

Assalamoalaikum wa Rehmatullah wa Barakatohu.

Dear Dr. Syed Rashid Ali,

I would like to know about your opinion if one of the male Moslem wants to marry an Ahmadiyya lady to be his wife.

We believe that the Holy Prophet Mohammed SAAW is the last prophet, and we would say

"AshHadu an la ilaha illa-Llah, wa ashhadu anna Muhammadan Rasoolu-Llah"

Now, the situation when my friend is going to proposed marry, the 4 days before wedding day, he must say that :

"AshHadu an la ilaha illa-Llah, wa ashhadu anna AHMAD GHULAM MIRZA Rasoolu-Llah"

I could not believe that and what we did, we said to our friend that he must cancelled that ceremony.

So, we would like to ask you several questions according to that situation above :

1. Is that a sin to marry a lady that she knew about Qur'an and had different "shahadah" ?2. Could my friend marry her, if she testified that Muhammad is the Rasoolu-Llah ?

Thank you for your attention and We look forward to hear from you soon.

Yesaya Waterkamp

Jakarta, Indonesia

Second Letter from Indonesia:

Subject: Further development

Date: Sat, 14 Jun 1997 18:07:11 +0700

From: yesaya

To: rasyed@emirates.net.ae

Assalamoalaikum wa Rehmatullah wa Barakatohu.

Dear br Rasheed,

According to the confession of my friend . . . First, he recited the KALIMA with MUHAMMADAN RASULLAH and the Preacher at that time (he don't know his name) said to him that RECITING THIS KALIMA IS REALLY IMPORTANT BUT THERE IS ANOTHER KALIMA THAT IS THE PERFECT ONE, and the Preacher wants my friend to follow him to recite the second KALIMA where the name of MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD RASULLAH is mentioned.

After that, the Preacher said to my friend that right now he is a member of ahmadiyya because he was testified with that second KALIMA or in another word is called a BAI'AT. The girl's family came out from their room and shaken-hands to my friend to congratulate him, hugged him and kissed him. The girl and her family were smiled to him, and they took him to their chairman of ahmadiyya in Indonesia (he looks like a Pakistan or India) and the other leaders of ahmadiyya. My friend told us that the chairman talked with him in english and there was a guy who helped him to translate in Indonesian Language. After that, someone asked his full name and the guy wrote his name and he must signed in the form. That form only mentioned about his name, member nbr. , branch of Ahmadiyya and location, date and time and his sign. (that was my friend told to me). That was on Tuesday , June 3rd 1997.

Every Thursday night, we will read QUR'AN and listen the sermon and ask certain question that is related between our real life and the Holy Qur'an. That was on June 5th 1997. Now, my friend HERU CAHYONO,BA asked to the TEACHER what is the meaning of MIRZA GHULAM, and the teacher asked to him why and look at him sharply. For short, he explained what would happened to him on Tuesday. The teacher was angry to him and said that he was already apostate. there is no 26th Rasullah and bla bla bla ...... another sermon special for him. So, the conclusion that he must cancelled the wedding on sunday June 8th, 1997. The teacher also said to him for SHALAT ISTIKHARAH.

June 6th, 1997 he brings all books of ahmadiyya for us and we read those books, have arguments,etc. We think that all Informations are not enough, so I try to find some informations accross the Internet, then I found your website.

Right now I have several books, leaflet, etc as follows :

Leaflet Ahmadiyya ......... Title in Indonesia : JEMAAT AHMADIYAH (2 page) Contains : - The Founder of Ahmadiyya (with picture ) - Hazrat MIRZA TAHIR AHMAD (with Picture) - Introduction of Ahmadiyya - Address of Ahmadiyya ( I think this the Headquarter Ahmadiyya in Indonesia) - Ahmadiyya Broadcast (MTA International using INTELSAT Satelite) ( with 8 Languages in 8 Country include Indonesia) - Picture of "NASR" Mosque (Centre of activities in Iindonesia).Explanation Letter from Ahmadiyyah to Islamic Research and Education Foundation Indonesia. Islamic Research and Education Foundation or LPPI accused Ahmadiyya that : - Embarrassment of Islam and the Holy Qur'an and Prohibition in Indonesia. - Accusing to Ahmadiyya about their own Prophet, own Holy Book (TAKHZIRAH) and their own place for Hajj (RABWAH and QADIAN). The title in Indonesia is PENJELASAN JEMAAT AHMADIYYA INDONESIA Explanation of Ahmadiyya terhadap keberatan-keberatan dari pihak (accused) LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGKAJIAN ISLAM (LPPI) Islamic Research & Educ. F. (Sept 27, 1994 with 12 Pages).THREE IMPORTANT THINGS BY H. MAHMUD AHMAD CHEEMA M.A This book has 50 pages and was written in 1996. Contains : 1. JESUS (pbuh) 2. Door of Prophecies 3. The HAZRAT MIRZA GHULAM AHMAD.HAPPY NEWS BY H. MAHMUD AHMAD CHEEMA M.A This book has 107 pages and was written in 1996. Contains : A good news about the New Mesiah / Promised Mesiah is already here. Between number 3 and 4, some parts of them were already mentioned in your Website about JESUS pbuh.

I bought two books : - "EX MUBALIGH AHMADIYYA was Challenge their World Leader for MUBAHILA" - "Why I quit from AHMADIYYA " and those books was written by AHMAD HARIADI ex Mubaligh of AHMADIYYA.

After all, I would like to Inform you that I will send those Leaflets, Books and everythings that I have to you as soon as possible.

Now, The situation is getting hot, after my friend break the engagement with the girl, (I don't know if this break is forever or just for a while) and then my friend's family will have a meeting on this coming sunday Jun 11th, 1997. His family want me to attend that meeting and also they want me to show the first letter from you. I don't know what is going on but they already invite me to that meeting, so I will be there. After that meeting I will send you a letter again.

Wassalam

Yesaya HB Waterkamp

====================Following is my reply to Brother Yesaya===============

yesaya wrote:

> Assalamoalaikum wa Rehmatullah wa Barakatohu.

Dear Br Yesaya

Wa alaikum assalam wa rehmatullah was barakatohu

Thankyou for enquiring a very important issue. The short answer to your questions are: Yes it is a sin to marry a qadiani/ahmadi girl. For such a girl, reciting the Kalima of Muslims is not enough, she must also say and believe that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is not a prophet and is an apostate and Kafir.

First of all let me make it clear that usually Qadianis/Ahmadiyya is not openly asking anyone to recite such a Kalima where the name of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is recited. If they have asked your friend to do it, and if it is in writing somewhere even if it is in Indonesian language, please post a copy of it to me at my address: PO BOx 11560, Dibba alFujairah, United Arab Emirates.

Now coming to the real issue. Qadianis/Ahmadiyya Movement and its founder Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and his followers are declared APOSTATE, KAFIR, DISBELIEVERS and OUT OF THE FOLD OF ISLAM by all Muslim scholars of all the Muslim countires.

What does Mirza Ghulam Ahmad think about Muslims:

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad declared:

"Except for the CHILDREN OF PROSTITUTE, whose hearts have been sealed by God, everyone else believes in me and has accepted me.” " (Aina-e-Kamalat-e-Islam, Roohani Khazain vol.5 p.547)"God has revealed to me that anyone to whom my message has reached and he has not accepted me , he is not a muslim.”" (Letter of Mirza to Dr. Abdul Hakeem Khan Patialvi)"I have God’s inspiration that 'he who does not follow you and will not enter your Ba’ith and remain your opponent, he is disobedient of God and His Prophet, Hellish.' " (Advertisement in M’ayaar-ul-Akhyar by Mirza Ghulam p.8)"Thus remember as God has informed me, it is forbidden and absolutely forbidden to pray behind any disbeliever and hesitant; but is should be that your imam should be one of you." (Arba’een No 3, Roohani Khazain vol.17 p.417 footnote)Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's son says: "Our prayers are separate from Non-ahmadis, it is forbidden to give our girls to them, we are stopped to offer their funeral prayers. Now what is left that we can participate with them? There are only two kinds of relations - religious and worldly. For religious relations, it is the gathering for prayers and for worldly relations, it is the marriage and both are forbidden for us." (Mirza Basheer Ahmad s/o Mirza Ghulam, Kalimat alFasl p.169)

Thus as far as Qadianis/ahmadis are concerned, we all muslims are KAAFIR, BASTARDS, NON-MUSLIM, HELLISH, OUT OF THE FOLD OF ISLAM, etc. etc.

What does Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claim:

He claims that he is a prophet and he is the second advent of Holy Prophet Muhammad SAAW. He claims that he is superior to Holy Prophet SAAW. He claimed that he is Eisa ibne Maryam etc. etc.

It should be remembered that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad had gradually evolved his claims, starting in the begining with being a servant of Islam, progressing through a stage of being a Rejuvenator (Mujaddid) of Islam, Maseel Maseeh (resembling Messiah) to Promised Messiah and finally reaching the stage when he started claiming full-fledged prophethood. During these evolutions he had been vehemently denying the progression to next stage of his evolution. For example, when he claimed that he was a Maseel Maseeh, Muslim scholars accused him that he is preparing the ground for laying the claim to Messiahship. He denied this vehemently:

"This humble self has claimed that I am Maseel MOwood which stupid people has thought that it is Promised Messiah....I have never claimed that I am Messiah ibne Maryam. He who accuses me of such a thing is an absolute liarr and fabricator. Rather it has consistently been publicised from me for the last 7-8 years that I am Maseel Maseeh, that is, God has also put in my nature certain Spiritual qualities, nature and manners of Hazrat Eisa pbuh." (Izala-e-Auham, Roohani Khazain vol 3 p. 192)

However after sometime, in another place he said:

"I claim that I am the Promised Messiah about whom all the Divine scriptures have prophecised that he will come in the end." (Tohfa-e-Golravia, Roohani Khazain vol 22 p.295)

When he was asked how he became Son of Mary, because Hadith of Holy Prophet SAAW categorically mentions the coming of Eisa ibne Maryam, he came up with this fantastic explanation:

"He (God) named me Maryam in Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya part 3; then as is evident from Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, I developed with the qualities of Maryam for two years and then....like Maryam, the soul of Eisa (Jesus) was blown into me and, symbolically, I became pregnant and after several months, which were not more than 10 months, through an inspiration mentioned in Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya part 4, I was converted from Maryam to Eisa. Thus this is how I became Ibne Maryam." (Kishtee-e-Noah, Roohani Khazain vol 19 p.50)

Similarly in the begining he expressed his beliefs on the Finality of Prophethood and considered any such person who claims to be prophet as out of the fold of Islam. However Muslim scholars understood the drift of his writings and accused him that he is paving the way for claiming prophethood. He thus annoounced:

"I believe on all those things which are part of Islamic faith and as is the belief of Ahle Sunnah wal jamaat, I accept all those things which are testified by Quran and Hadith and after Syedna and Maulana Muhammad Mustafa SAAW, Khatamul Mursaleen, consider any claimant of prophethood and messengership as LIAR and KAAFIR." (Announcement dated 2nd October 1891, Collection of Advertisements)

However he kept saying things which were clearly indicating his future intentions and preparing his followers mentally to accept his claim of prophethood. He kept giving mind boggling explanations (the examples of such writings have already been given by the Ahmadi who has posted the article) to make room for his prophethood. Finally when he thought that the time was ripe, he laid the claim.

Mirza Declares Islam a Dead/Accursed/Satanic Religion:

"We believe that a religion which does not have the continuity of Prophethood (as in Islam) is a dead religion. We call the religions of the Jews, the Christians and the Hindus dead only because now there are no prophets in them. If this were the position in Islam too, we would be no more than mere story-tellers. Why do we regard it superior to other religions? It must have some distinction". (Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol. 10, page 127)"That religion is no religion and that prophet is no prophet by following whom a man does not come so close to God as to be honoured with divine conversation. That religion is accursed and contemptible which teaches that human progress depends only on a few narrated anecdotes (i.e. stories in Holy Quran and the Shari'at-e-Muhammadia which is narrated from the Holy Prophet pbuh - Compiler)and that the 'WAHI' has lagged behind instead of going ahead......hence such a religion deserves to be called satanic rather than divine religion." (Zamima-e-Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, Part V, Roohani Khazain, Vol. 21, p. 306)"How absurd and false it is to believe that after the Holy Prophet (pbuh) the door of the divine 'wahi' has been closed for ever and there is no hope of it in the future till the Day of Resurrection - just worship the stories. Can a religion having no direct trace of Almighty Allah be called a religion? . . . . . I say, by Almighty God, that in this age there is no one more fed up than myself with such a religion. I name such a religion as Satanic religion and not Rehmani (divine) and I believe that such religion guides towards Hell and keeps one blind in life and till death." (Zamima-e-Braheen-e-Ahmadiyya, Part V, page 183; Roohani Khazain, Vol. 21, p. 354)

 

Qadianis debase the Islamic Kalimah
Posted by admin on Wednesday, October 07 @ 01:37:48 AST (1359 reads)
(Read More... | 39332 bytes more | Score: 0)
Ahmadiyya's abuse of Muslim epithet

Bismillah arRahman arRahim

Anti Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam November 2002  

Qadianis debase the Islamic Kalimah

Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianvi

 

This article draws special attention of the reader to the fact that the Qadianis deem Mirza Ghulam Ahmad as a Prophet incarnate through reincarnation, ie rebirth of the holy Prophet of Islam in Mirza Ghulam Ahmad's person. Thus they have rebelled against Islam and seceded from it. They have infactgiven the pretender a place higher than that of the holy Prophet (SAW).

 The contents of this text are based on authenic Qadiani literature with references to the relevant book and page. We take full responsibility and do hereby declare that the sources are authentic and correct.

To Qadianis Muhammad (SAW) is Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Himself

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad claims that he himself is (na-auzoo-billah) Muhammad (SAW):

Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. and those who are with him are strong against Unbelievers, (but) compassionate amongst each other. (Holy Quran 48.29)

Mirza said, "In this divine revelation (the above verse) I have been named Muhammad as well as the Messenger of Allah". (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.3;Roohani Khazain vol.18, p.207).

The So-Called Two Prophetic Appointments Of Muhammad (SAW)

The reasons why the Qadianis deem Mirza to be Muhammad (SAW) is that according to the Qadiani belief, `Khatam un Nabieen' (the final Prophet (SAW)) had been ordained to be born in Mecca as Muhammad. For the second time, according to the Qadianis, he was reincarnated in Qadian as Mirza Ghulam Ahmad ! In other words, the spirt of Muhammad (SAW) along with his prophetic accomplishments allegedly appeared a second tme in the incarnation of Mirza. And we quote:  

"And know that just as our holy Prophet (SAW) was born in the 5th century, in the same way he was reborn in the end of 19th century in the incarnation of the Promised Masih" (Mirza). (khutbah-e-Ilhamiah,p.180; Roohani Khazain, vol.16,p270)

"The holy Prophet (SAW) had two births as a Prophet. In other words, we may say that it was promised that the holy Prophet (SAW) would be born in the world once and once more reincarnated and this was fulfilled by the incarnation of the promised Masih and the promised Mahdi" (Mirza). (Tuhfa-e-Golravia, p94; footnote, Roohani Khazian, vol.17,p.249)

Mirza of Qadian Claimed To Be The Same As Muhammad (SAW)

According to Qadiani belief Muhammad (SAW) with all his excellence was reincarnated in Mirza of Qadian. As such the entity of Mirza of Qadian is (na-uzoo-billah)the same as the entity of Muhammad (SAW). Mirza has said:

"And Allah bestowed upon me the bounty of the holy Prophet and made it perfect, and he drew towards me the kindness and generosity of that merciful Prophet, so much so that my entity became his entity. Thus he who joins my Jamaat really becomes one of the Sahaba of my chief who was better then all the Prophets. It is not hidden from those with the ability to think that this is what the words "others of them" mean. The person who makes a difference between me and Mustafa has neither seen me nor recoginised me". (Khutbah-e-Ilhamiah, p.171; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.258-259).

Mirza of Qadian Claimed That He Posessed All The Virtues And Excellence Of Muhammad (SAW)

Once the belief had been fabricated that the being of Mirza is exactly the being of Muhammad (SAW) and that it is Muhammad (SAW) himself who was reincarnated in Qadian as Mirza, then it must also be alleged that all the accomplishments and distinctions of Muhammad (SAW) were transferred to Mirza. Mirza has said:

"When I am the holy Prophet incarnate and when all the accomplishments of Muhammad including the prophethood are reflected in my mirror of my shadiness, then who is the man who has claimed prophethood in a seperate being ?" (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.8; Roohani Khazain, vol.18,p.212)

"The entity of the promised Masih (Mirza), in the sight of Allah is the entity of the holy Prophet (SAW). In other words, in the records of Allah there is no duality or difference between the promised Masih and the holy Prophet (SAW). Rather they both share the same eminence, the same rank, the same status and the same name. Although verbally they are two, yet in reality they are one and the same". (Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol.3, No.37, dated 16th September 1915, as cited in Qadiani Mazhab page 207, 9th edition, Lahore)

Mirza Of Qadian Claimed That He Was The Final Prophet

According to the Qadiani belief, the "Qadiani based" birth of Muhammad (SAW) as a prophet took place in the incarnate AUTAR, Mirza of Qadian. And as he became incarnate of Muhammad (SAW) then Miraz becomes the "final prophet" too ! Mirza says:

I have told so many times that according to the verse: "And others of them.." I am incarnate the last of the Prophets. Twenty years ago Allah named me in Braheen-e-Ahamadia, Muhammad and AHmad and declared that I am the holy Prophets (SAW) incarnation. (Ek Ghalti Ka Izala, p.8; Roohani Khazain vol.18; p212)

"Blessed is he who has recognised me. Of all the paths to God I am the last path, and of all his Lights, I am the last Light. Unfortunate is he who forsakes me, because without me all is darkness". (Kashti-e-Nooh, p.56; Roohani Khazain, vol.19, p.61).

Mirza of Qadian Claimed He Was The Best Of The Prophets Of Allah

"Many thrones have descended from heaven but thy throne has been placed the highest". (Tazkirah 2nd Ed, p.643)

"The various accomplishments which were bestowed upon all other Prophets were concentrated in a greater degree in the holy Prophet. All those accomplishments have been conferred on me through the holy Prophets reincarnation in me. That is why I bear the names of Adam, Abraham, Moses, Noah, Solomon, Jesus, etc. Allthe previous Prophets were the incarnations of special attributes of the holy Prophet but I am the the reincarnation of all the attributes of the holy Prophet". (Malfoozat-e-Mirza, Vol.3, P.270)

Mirza of Qadian Claimed That He Was Superior To Muhammad (SAW)

The Qadianis believe that Mirzas reincarnation was superior to the Prophets first birth in Mecca. Mirza says:

"One who denies that the orainment of the Prophet (SAW) is related to the 6th thousand as it was related to the 5th thousand, denies the truth and the mandate of the Quran. the truth is that the spirituality of the (reincarnated) holy Prophet at the end of the 6th thousand (ie these days), is much more stronger, more complete and severe than in those early years. rathe it is like the 14th (moonlit) night". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, p181; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, pp.271-272)

The Simile Of "The New Moon" Used For The Holy Prophet (SAW) And That Of "The Full Moon" Used For Mirza

The superiority of the Qadiani incarnation has been expressed in yet another style: viz. During the Meccan age the holy Prophet (SAW), Isalm was like the Crescent in which there is no light but in his so-called Qadiani reincarnation, Islam became lighted and illuminated like the full moon. Mirza said:

"And Islam started like the cescent which was destined ultimately to become in the later ages the full moon by the command of God. Thus Allahs wisdom willed that Islam should asume the form of the full moon in that century which sholud resemble the full moon by way of counting". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, p181; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, p.275)

"To declare those who denied the holy Prophet in his first birth as unbelievers and outside the fold of Islam, but to regard the deniers of his second birth as muslim is an insult to the Prophet and a joke against the signs of Allah, although the promised Masih has in Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, compared the mutual relation between the first and the second births of the holy Prophet to the relationship between the crescent and the full moon". (Akhbar Al-Fazl, Qadian, Vol.3, No.10, dated 15th July 1915 as cited in Qadiani Mazhab p262)

Greater Manifest Victory

In order to express the superiority of Mirza it was calimed that the manifest victory achieved by Mirza was greater then the manifest victory of the holy Prophet (SAW). Thus Mirza said

"It is apparent that the time of the manifest victory of the era of the holy Prophet has expired, and the second victory which was to be much greater and clearer then the first one had yet to be achieved. It ws ordained that its time should fall during the times of the promised Masih". (Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah, pp193-194(Khutbah-e-Ilahmiah; Roohani Khazain, vol.16, p.288)

SO-CALLED BEGINNING AND PERFECTION OF MIRZA'S SPIRITUAL EXCELLENCE

It was also claimed that the era of the Makki birth of the holy Prophet (SAW) was only the first step in his progress of spiritual attainments, whereas his Qadiani reincarnation represents the highest pinnacle of his spiritual development. Thus it is said:

"The spirituality of our holy Prophet (SAW) was conceived 5th thousand (ie Makki birth) with its precise attributes and that period was not the the climax of his spirituality's development. It was rather the first step to the highest pinnacle of its perfection. Thereafter this spirituality manifested itself in its full glamour during the 6th thousand [his rebirth in Qadian] at the present time". (Khutba-e-llhamiah, p177; Roohani Khazain, Vol.16, p.266)

The Qadiani Funeral
Posted by admin on Wednesday, October 07 @ 01:10:57 AST (1323 reads)
(Read More... | 46271 bytes more | Score: 0)
Ahmadiyya's abuse of Muslim epithet

Bismillah arRahman arRahim

Anti Ahmadiyya Movement in Islam November 2002    

The Qadiani Funeral

Maulana Muhammad Yusuf Ludhianvi

Authentic religious rulings (Fatawa) issued in the light of the Islamic Shari'at in reply to questions as to how the MuSlims should conduct themselves in their dealings with the Qadianis/Ahmadis/Mirzais.

QUESTIONS

1. On the death of Dr. Muhammad Saeed, a Mirzai of Village Datah, Dist. Mansahra, the Muslims of Datah offered his funeral prayer under a Muslim Imam. Thereafter the Qadianis held a second funeral prayer for the said deceased person. What is the injunction of the Shari'at about the said Imam and the Muslims (who participated in the funeral prayer)?

 2. Muslim girls are living in Qadiani households as wives. Their Muslim parents are maintaining son/father-in-law relations with these Qadianis. Will the children born from such wedlocks be regarded as legitimate or illegitimate children in thee light of the Shari'at of the holy Prophet Muhammad (SAW).

 3. The Muslim communities in general do not treat the Qadianis like other Kafirs (infidels); they treat them like Muslims. They freely mix, eat and drink with the Qadianis and participate in their joys and sorrows and bid them Assalamu alaykum (peace on you), when they meet one another. Likewise, they invite them to their funeral and marriage feasts and take part in Fatihas. Are they (the Muslims) accountable for such acts and do they remain as Muslims in the light of the Shari'at?

Majlis-e-Tahaffuz-e-Khatm-e-Nubuwwat. District Mansahra.

THE ANSWER

In the name of Allah the Beneficient and Merciful

 Before stating the answers, I mention a few points by way of introductory remarks.

First, if there is anyone who holds beliefs of infidelity and yet claims to be a Muslim and presents his beliefs of infidelity in the name of Islam, by placing wrong interpretations on the texts of the Shari'at, he is called a Zindeeq. In the chapter on "Zindeeq" (The Apostate), Allama Shami writes:

"....because a Zindeeq camouflages his infidelity ana desires to popularise his false beliefs and presents them in an apparently plausible form, this is what is called camouflaging infidelity". (Shami Vol. 4, p.246, New Edition).

 In Musawwa, an Arabic commentary on Muwatta Imamul Hind, Shah Waliullah Muhaddith Dehlavi writes:

 "It may be explained that a person who is opposed to the true Faith and does not believe in Islam, nor does he acknowledge the religion of Islam, either outwardly or inwardly, is called a Kafir. If he believes in the Faith only verbally, but offers such interpretations of some fundamentals of the Faith as contradict the views of the Sahabah, the Tabi'een and the consensus of the Ummah, then such a person is called a Zindeeq".

 By way of explaining the difference between a correct interpretation and a wrong interpretation, Shah Waliullah further writes:-

"Moreover, there are two kinds of interpretations: Onethat does not contravene a decision that stands finally established under the authority of the Qur'an and the Sunnah; the other one is that interpretation which contravenes a decision that stands proved under a finally established evidence (based on the Qur'an and /or the Sunnah). Such an interpretation is Zandaqah".

 Citing examples of interpretations that involve Zandaqah, Shah Waliullah further writes:

"... or some person says that although the noble Prophet (SAW) is undoubtedly the last of the Prophets, yet this only means that after him none will be given the name of a Prophet, but the concept of prophethood--viz., the sending down by Allah of some person who must be obeyed as a matter of obligation and who has been protected from persevering in sins and faults -- continues in the Ummah even after the noble Prophet (SAW) then such a person is a Zindeeq." (Musawwa, Vol. 2, p.l30)

In short, one is called a Zindeeq who presents his beliefs of infidelity in the garb of Islam, interprets the Qur'an and the Sunnah in a way that is contrary to the finally confirmed Islamic beliefs handed down through uninterrupted authority.

Secondly: a Zindeeq falls within the purview of an apostate. In one respect a Zindeeq is worse than an apostate, because if by expressing repentance, an apostate re-embraces Islam, there is consensus of opinion that his repentance is acceptable, but opinions differ about the acceptability or the unacceptability of the repentance of a Zindeeq.

It occurs in Durr-i-Mukhtar: '... in the same way the repentance of a person who becomes a Kafir on account of his Zandaqah is not acceptable. He has been described in Fathul Qadeer as Zahirul Mazhab (professing the Faith only outwardly), but the Fatwa given in the book of Fatawa Qazi Khan in the chapter "Al- Hazr" lays down: If a magician or a Zindeeq, who is well-known and preaches (his beliefs), is arrested before expressing repentance and repents after his arrest, his repentance is not acceptable. He shall be executed. On the other hand, if he has expressed repentance before arrest, his repentance will be accepted. (Al-Shami, Vol. 4, p.241, New Edition)

It occurs in Bahrur Ra'iq:-

 "In the case of Zahirul-Mazhab (outward profession of faith), the repentance of a Zindeeq is not acceptable--Zindeeq being a person who follows no religion. It is mentioned in Fatawa Qazi Khan: If a Zindeeq, before being arrested, confesses willingly, that he is a Zindeeq and then expresses repentance there for, his repentance will be acceptable; but if he expresses repentance after his arrest, then his repentance will not be accepted and he will be executed." (Bahrur Raiq, Vol. 5, p. 136).

Thirdly: That the Qadianis are Zindeeq is quite obvious, because their beliefs are totally opposed to the tenets of Islam. By placing wrong interpretations on the texts of the Qur'an and the Sunnah, they try to delude the ignorant into the belief that they themselves (Qadianis) are staunch, true Muslims and besides them the entire Muslim Ummah is misguided, Kafir and faithless. This is according to what the late Mirza Mahmud, the second Head of the Qadianis, has written:-

 "All Muslims who did not swear allegiance tothe promised Masih (i.e. Mirza) are Kafirs (infidels) and out of the pale of Islam, even if they may not have heard the name of the promised Masih." (Ai-eena-i-Sadaqat, p. 35).

The Heretic Beliefs of the Mirzais

1. It is the finally confirmed belief of Islam that the noble Prophet (SAW) is the last of the Prophets, and after him none can rise to the status of prophet hood. On the contrary, not only do the Qadianis deny this belief, but they also consider that without the prophethood of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, Islam is a dead religion (Allah forbid).

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad says:-

"We believe that a religion in which thesuccession of prophet hood stands closed is dead. We call the Jewish, the Christian and the Hindu (religions) dead, because they have no prophets. If Islam, too, were like them, then we are no more than story-tellers. Why do we claim that it (Islam) is superior to other religions? Islam should have some distinction to justify this claim... For many years I have been receiving wahi (revelations) and many signs of Allah have borne witness to this. I am, therefore, a Prophet. No secrecy should be maintained in conveying the truth". (Malfoozate Mirza, Vol. 10, pp. 127 -128).

2. It is the finally confirmed belief of Islam that the door of Prophethood has been closed after the departure of the noble Prophet (SAW) and he who claims to (receive) prophetic revelations stands expelled from the pale of Islam. However, the Qadianis believe in the self-invented revelation of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani and recognise it like the Qur'an. The Tazkirah is one of the various names of the Qur'an. The Qadanis have compiled the revelations of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad in the form of a book and have given it the name of Tazkirah, as though it were the Qadiani Qur'an--Allah forbid. Further, the Qadiani revelation is not an ordinary llham (inspiration) which divine men also receive. To them (the Qadianis) it is at par with the Qur'an. Just see:

(i) "... and I believe in the open wahi of Allah which I have received, precisely in the same way as I believe in the verses of the Qur'an. (Ek Ghalati ka Izalah, p.6.).

(ii) "I believe in my wahi in the same way as I believe in the Torah, the Injeel and the Qur'an . " (Arba'een, p.112).

(iii)"... I swear by God that I believe in these revelations in the same way as I believe in the Qur'an and other divine Scriptures. I believe that the word that descends on me is the word of God, just as I believe that the Qur'an is surely and decidedly the word of God." (Haqiqat-ul-Wahi, p.220).

3. It is an Islamic belief that it is Kufr to claim that one is able to show a miracle after the departure of the noble Prophet (SAW) because the display of miracles is the exclusive privilege of a prophet. As such, one who claims the ability to show a miracle is a Kafir, because one (thus) claims to be a prophet.

Allama Mulla Ali Qari (Allah's mercy on him) writes in Sharh-i-Fiqh Akbar on page 202:

"The claim to the ability to show a miracle is a branch of the claim to prophethood and the claim to prophethood after our noble Prophet (SAW) is deemed as Kufr by unanimous consensus.

On the contrary, the Qadianis, along with their faith in the revelations of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Qadiani, also put faith in his miracles. They regard the miracles of the noble Prophet as mere stories and tales--Allah forbid. They are prepared to believe in the noble Prophet (SAW) as a prophet only when Mirza Ghulam Ahmad is also believed to be a Prophet, otherwise neither they consider the noble Prophet as a Prophet, nor Islam as a religion.

Mirza Ghulam Ahmad writes:

"Neither that religion is a religion, nor that Prophet a Prophet by following which/whom a human being does not attain such closeness to Allah as confers on him the honour of conversation with Allah. That religion is a curse and an object of contempt which teaches that human progress depends on a few narrated anecdotes (i.e. the Islamic Shari'at which is narrated from the noble Prophet (SAW) - Compiler) and that divine revelations have lagged behind instead of going ahead... hence such a religion deserves to be called Satanic rather than divine". (Zameema-i-Baraheen-i-Ahmadia, Part V. p.l39).


Page Generation: 0.60 Seconds